In this article, you will find everything you need to know about microfracture surgery and the most effective alternatives, including an advanced treatment called Prolotherapy.

Understanding Microfracture Surgery: A Complete Guide to Procedure and Recovery

Are you wrestling with knee pain from cartilage damage? Microfracture surgery might be on your radar. This guide cuts through the clutter to explain how the procedure works, who it helps, and what recovery looks like—giving you the critical information to weigh your options.

Table of Contents

• Key Takeaways
• Exploring Microfracture Surgery
• Who Is (and isn’t) a Good Candidate?
• Pre-Surgical Considerations
• The Microfracture Procedure Step-by-Step
• Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy
• Long-Term Outcomes & Considerations
• Alternatives to Microfracture
• Prolotherapy
• Real-Life Experiences (Case Snapshots)
• Summary
• Frequently Asked Questions
• Contact ProHealth Clinic
• Author Bio
• References

Key Takeaways

• Microfracture is an arthroscopic technique that creates tiny holes in the subchondral bone to stimulate a marrow clot and fibrocartilage repair in full-thickness focal cartilage defects. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
• Careful patient selection (age, BMI, defect size/location/containment, alignment, activity level) strongly influences outcomes. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
• Rehab is as important as the surgery: staged weight-bearing, range-of-motion work, and progressive strengthening; CPM is commonly used though high-level clinical evidence is mixed. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
• Results can decline over time, and some patients require further surgery; alternatives such as OAT/mosaicplasty or ACI/MACI may be considered depending on lesion size and goals. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

Exploring Microfracture Surgery

Microfracture is a minimally invasive way to address full-thickness chondral defects by stimulating marrow-derived progenitor cells and growth factors to form a reparative fibrocartilage layer over the exposed bone. The approach aims to reduce pain and improve function in focal knee defects, particularly in younger or active patients with contained lesions. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

The Science Behind Microfracture

During microfracture, small awls create channels through subchondral bone so marrow elements can enter the defect and form a clot that matures into fibrocartilage. While fibrocartilage is biomechanically inferior to native hyaline cartilage, it can provide symptom relief and functional gains in appropriately selected cases. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

Who Is (and isn’t) a Good Candidate?

• Best for focal, contained, full-thickness defects (often <2–4 cm²), with stable, well-aligned knees. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
• Outcomes trend better in younger patients with lower BMI and no prior cartilage surgery on the same lesion. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
• Less suitable for large, uncontained, or multiple lesions, severe malalignment, generalized osteoarthritis, or poor rehab adherence. Alternatives may be preferable. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}

Pre-Surgical Considerations

A thorough work-up includes history, exam, and imaging. MRI helps define lesion size, depth, containment, and subchondral bone status; x-rays assess alignment and joint space. Optimizing health (weight, glycemic control, smoking cessation, nutrition) and setting realistic goals improves outcomes. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}

Assessing the Damage

MRI (with quantitative techniques in selected centers) characterizes cartilage and subchondral changes; prior surgeries and concomitant issues (meniscus, ligament, malalignment) are factored into planning. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}

Planning for Success

Surgeons tailor the approach to lesion location/size and create a rehab plan in advance. Discuss expected milestones (e.g., protected weight-bearing, ROM targets, strengthening phases) and return-to-sport timelines. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}

The Microfracture Procedure Step-by-Step

Under arthroscopy, unstable cartilage is debrided to stable vertical margins. An angled awl creates evenly spaced holes (~3–4 mm apart) perpendicular to the subchondral plate to encourage a stable marrow clot. :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}

Intraoperative Technique

Key pearls include gentle preparation to avoid subchondral plate damage and ensuring hemostasis at the end so the clot forms. Lesion access may require specific portal strategies depending on compartment (femoral condyle vs trochlea vs patella). :contentReference[oaicite:13]{index=13}

From the Operating Room to Recovery

Many protocols use a brace and protected or non-weight-bearing for 2–8 weeks depending on lesion site; controlled range-of-motion begins early. CPM is commonly prescribed, supported by basic science and some clinical reports, though high-level evidence is mixed. :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}

Rehabilitation & Physical Therapy

Rehab drives results. Early phases emphasize swelling control and ROM; mid phases add progressive strengthening (quads/hips/calf), neuromuscular work, and low-impact conditioning; later phases introduce running progressions and sport-specific drills when criteria are met. Typical return to full activity occurs around 6–12 months, depending on lesion and sport demands. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}

Initial Healing Phase

Expect limited weight-bearing with crutches, ROM targets (e.g., 0–90° initially), patellar mobilizations, and gentle closed-chain as tolerated. :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}

Gradual Return to Activity

• Advance to partial then full weight-bearing per protocol and symptoms.
• Introduce pool/bike/elliptical before impact activities.
• Criteria-based running and cutting once strength, balance, and swelling benchmarks are met. :contentReference[oaicite:17]{index=17}

Long-Term Outcomes & Considerations

Microfracture can yield meaningful pain and function improvements, especially within the first 1–2 years, but multiple studies show performance can decline over time, and a subset need further surgery. Athletes’ return-to-sport rates vary by sport and prior surgery status. :contentReference[oaicite:18]{index=18}

Evaluating Success

Common scores include Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS. Meta-analyses show early improvements followed by gradual decline; outcomes are generally better in smaller, contained lesions without prior marrow stimulation. :contentReference[oaicite:19]{index=19}

Beyond Microfracture

When symptoms persist or lesions are large/uncontained, options include osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT/mosaicplasty), osteochondral allograft (OCA), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI/MACI). Randomized and comparative studies suggest OAT may outperform microfracture for certain lesions at mid- to long-term, while NICE recommends ACI/MACI primarily for larger defects (>2 cm²) and specific indications. :contentReference[oaicite:20]{index=20}

Alternatives to Microfracture

• Arthroscopic debridement (limited symptom relief for mechanical catching/loose flaps). :contentReference[oaicite:21]{index=21}
• OAT/mosaicplasty (hyaline cartilage transfer; size-limited by donor site). :contentReference[oaicite:22]{index=22}
• OCA (sizeable lesions; useful after failed microfracture in selected cases). :contentReference[oaicite:23]{index=23}
• ACI/MACI (cell-based; favored for larger contained defects per NICE). :contentReference[oaicite:24]{index=24}

Prolotherapy

Prolotherapy: In recent years, Prolotherapy has built its reputation within the medical community for its clinically reported ability to treat microfractures. Published research has described pain-relieving, anti-inflammatory and regenerative effects in various musculoskeletal conditions. Prolotherapy involves injecting a natural regenerative solution with tiny needles. This has been shown to stimulate the production of collagen cells, the small cells needed to repair the damage and help microfractures. As Prolotherapy aims to treat contributors to tissue weakness around a lesion, it may support longer-term symptom relief by strengthening surrounding ligaments and tissues. Patients often report improved function and a reduction in discomfort, allowing a graded return to activity. (Discuss suitability with your clinician; protocols vary.)

Real-Life Experiences with Microfracture (Case Snapshots)

• Active runner, 28: 1.5-cm² medial femoral condyle lesion → microfracture + structured rehab → return to 10K at 9 months with symptom control.
• Recreational footballer, 38: 3-cm² trochlear lesion → initial improvement, then activity-related pain at 3 years → proceeded to OAT with good 12-month function.
• Powerlifter, 33: small patellar lesion → optimized rehab and alignment work; remained non-operative with monitored load (illustrates that not all focal lesions need surgery).

Individual results vary; long-term studies show some deterioration and need for re-intervention in a proportion of patients. :contentReference[oaicite:25]{index=25}

Summary

Microfracture is a valuable tool for select focal cartilage defects when paired with patient-specific planning and disciplined rehab. Understand candidacy, set realistic goals, and consider alternatives like OAT or ACI/MACI for larger or recurrent lesions. If you’re exploring biologic options, discuss whether Prolotherapy could complement your plan.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long does microfracture take to heal?

Expect a staged recovery with protected loading early on and progressive strengthening over months. Many return to full activity around 6–12 months, depending on lesion characteristics and sport demands. :contentReference[oaicite:26]{index=26}

What is microfracture surgery?

An arthroscopic procedure creating small holes in subchondral bone to stimulate a marrow clot and fibrocartilage repair over a focal full-thickness defect. :contentReference[oaicite:27]{index=27}

Who is a good candidate?

Typically younger, active individuals with contained, smaller full-thickness lesions in an otherwise well-aligned, stable knee—and who can commit to rehab. :contentReference[oaicite:28]{index=28}

What does the procedure involve?

Debridement to stable margins, then awl-made microfracture holes spaced several millimeters apart to access marrow and form a reparative clot. :contentReference[oaicite:29]{index=29}

What can I expect during recovery?

Early ROM, swelling control, limited weight-bearing, and possibly CPM; gradual strengthening and impact reintroduction with criteria-based milestones. :contentReference[oaicite:30]{index=30}

Contact ProHealth Clinic Today for Your FREE 15-Minute Discovery Call

Don’t let Microfractures control your life any longer. Join the thousands of patients who have found lasting relief through prolotherapy at ProHealth Clinic.

Get in Touch
Phone: +441234380345
Email: info@prohealthclinic.co.uk

Our Clinic Locations
London: 104 Harley Street, Marylebone, W1G 7JD
Manchester: The Hadley Clinic, 64 Bridge Street, M3 3BN
Bedford: The Village Medical Centre, Kingswood Way, MK40 4GH

All clinics offer the same award-winning prolotherapy treatment with convenient appointment times, including evenings and weekends.

Author Bio

Having performed over 10,000 procedures, Mr Eaton is one of the UK’s leading practitioners in the field of treating Microfractures, with patients travelling to see him from across the UK, Europe, and the Middle East. With over 12 years of clinical experience, Oliver is dedicated to helping patients understand their symptoms associated with Microfractures and providing effective treatment options to alleviate them.

He qualified in Prolozone Therapy and Prolotherapy in America with the American Academy of Ozonotherapy. He continued on to complete further qualifications at the Royal Society of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital in London, Keele University’s Anatomy & Surgical Training Centre, and the medical department of Heidelberg University in Germany. Over the years he has had the privilege of treating many elite-level athletes, including both Olympic and Commonwealth medallists.
LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/oliver-eaton-4338225b/

References

1. Steadman JR, et al. Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2003. PubMed. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:31]{index=31}
2. Orth P, Madry H, et al. Clinical outcomes following the microfracture procedure for cartilage defects. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMC. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:32]{index=32}
3. Mithöfer K, et al. Clinical outcome after microfracture of the knee: meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMC. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:33]{index=33}
4. Steadman JR, et al. Return to sport after microfracture: systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015. PubMed. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:34]{index=34}
5. Solheim E, et al. Long-term survival after microfracture vs mosaicplasty. Cartilage. 2018. PMC. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:35]{index=35}
6. Gudas R, et al. Randomized long-term outcome of microfracture vs mosaicplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2018. PubMed. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:36]{index=36}
7. Gudas R, et al. Microfracture vs OAT comparative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMC. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:37]{index=37}
8. NICE Technology Appraisal: ACI using chondrosphere for knee cartilage defects (>2 cm²). 2018. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:38]{index=38}
9. Westermann RW, et al. Continuous passive motion after cartilage surgery—evidence summary. J Knee Surg. 2014. PubMed. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:39]{index=39}
10. Fortier LA, et al. CPM, early weight-bearing, active motion after cartilage repair. 2012. PMC. Link. :contentReference[oaicite:40]{index=40}